Limiting beliefs

July 13, 2007

At the Life Club this week we looked at something that come up a lot in coaching situations – Limiting Beliefs (beliefs you hold which limit what you think of as being possible for yourself). A crucial part of dealing with these little beggars is of course being aware that they’re there in the first place. One of the participants raised a very good question – how do you spot them? A few tips came to mind. But I kept thinking about it, because I felt I hadn’t quite got to the nub. And I think the nub is this: you don’t. In the normal course of events, that is. In the usual, within-the-comfort-zone routine, you don’t see them because you don’t even go near them. You have to be in the process of going beyond that comfort zone before you come up against limiting beliefs, as they try to push you back into comfort.

What you can’t do is eliminate your limiting beliefs before you set out on some new enterprise. You just have to get out there, machete in hand, and hack your way through them while you’re on the hoof. But then, isn’t that part of the excitement? What’s the point of doing something new if it feels exactly like what you already do? Why go to France and eat cheddar? (Another Fauxtation there, methinks…)


Why oh why oh why?

July 12, 2007

Fred’s 11 today. He’s at an inquisitive stage. The other day, for example, he asked me if zebras are white with black stripes or black with white stripes. I remember when I was going through that phase. If Dad didn’t know the answer, he’d say “Ask your Uncle Nigel.” I never did ask Uncle Nigel – I found him rather scary – but grew up thinking he must be the font of all wisdom, the man who knew the stuff even Dad didn’t know.

So Fred’s also doing that irritating game where he says “Why?” and I answer and he says “Why?” and so on ad intinitum. I got bored of this, so I decided to use it as an inquiry, and just think about actually coming up with answers. I mean, I’m supposed to be so keen on discovering stuff and not shying away from asking questions after all.

He soon smelled a rat though, and quickly changed the subject to something less educational. Oh well, we soldier on.


Ties and choosing

July 11, 2007

I heard a great item on Radio 4′s Today program yesterday. Wayne Hemingway, of Red Or Dead fame, and some other worthy were discussing tie wearing. Wayne – always given to the outre and unconventional when it comes to getting dressed, as any fule kno – is plainly vehemently tie-averse, while the other chap was quite relaxed about the whole issue. The latter ventured the opinion that, since his school never required ties, or indeed any uniform, to be worn, the whole thing was a complete non-issue for him and he was just as happy in a tie as out.

This all made me think about choice, particularly since the debate, while never acrimonious, did get pretty heated. Passions clearly abounded about school and neckwear. The thing is, doing the opposite of what you’re told is just as narrow as doing exactly what you’re told. Choice isn’t about having to wear a tie at school and therefore refusing to do so for the rest of your life, just because you don’t have to any more. If that’s how it is, you still haven’t left school. Choice is freedom – including the freedom to wear a tie, even though it’s what someone else wants you to do.

I should mention, by the way, that I have a LEGENDARY collection of ties, many of which ended up in my wardrobe as a result of being banned from that of their former owners by some nameless third party.


bikes and space

July 10, 2007

The Tour de France is on! And I’ve figured out what’s truly great about it: you need to take nearly a whole day to watch it. Then? Repeat daily for three weeks. While it’s on, the GDP of France sinks, because the French are so universally keen that they abandon everything else for the duration. And herein lies the key you can’t beat the Tour for giving you space. It is truly relaxing and satisfying to watch, because you have to give yourself permission to do nothing else. There may be a crash or a breakaway any minute – it’s just that there’s a lot of minutes. Around three or four hundred of them each day. It’s like cricket, in that nothing much might happen for a very long time, and yet you’re on the edge of your seat in a very mild way pretty much all the time. Just in case it does.

You could quite happily watch the highlights and get the drift and the exciting bits – and lose all the point. That would make it sensible, contained within a practical span of time that doesn’t clash with work. Forget football. There’s nothing relaxing about its sweaty shoutiness and crappy histrionics, and it lasts a paltry 90 minutes or so. (So I hear – I’m no expert on this.) And it’s on at the weekend. That’s just bread and circuses. No more than low-grade cathartic release of a week’s boredom and frustration. The Tour simply bids au revoir to work altogether for the best part of a month.

Now that, for all the lycra and skinny tyres, is anarchy.


Solitaire as self-development aid shocker!

July 9, 2007

I was playing a game of Solitaire on my phone just now. Kat’s noticed that I play a very cautious game, trying to control when I get cards out and not to get important ones trapped somewhere I can’t get them. That’s all very strategically effective, but Kat usually seems to score better than me. Even though she plays, oh I dunno, one game for every ten of mine. I actually caught myself looking at the backs of cards yet to be turned over, trying to figure out a system for prioritising which row to turn over first. (I mean, really…)

Then I thought “Just make the bold move. You’re no more likely to fail.” Followed rapidly by “Oooo, that sounds wise!” The thing is, it really is true. You don’t KNOW the outcome either way, so you might as well have fun with it. There’s nothing wrong with using your head either. You don’t have to go apeshit at the drop of a hat just to prove you’re being spontaneous. It’s all about finding your own balance – not according to whether you’ll stand or fall, but according to how you feel like living. It ain’t what you do, it’s the way that you do it, that type of thing.

By the way, “Just make the bold move. You’re no more likely to fail,” is technically a fauxtation. That’s to say, it kind of sounds like it might be a quotation, but isn’t.


Hoorah for Live Earth!

July 8, 2007

On the radio this morning I heard the normally redoubtable Michael Parkinson and guest slagging off Live Earth because of performers getting there by means other than bike. Pish and tush, says I.

It’s such a playground reaction. “You smell!” “No, YOU smell!” equals “You’ve got a big carbon footprint!” “No, YOU’VE got a big carbon footprint!”

People, this isn’t something to get defensive about and belittle the messengers. Yes, pop stars use more aeroplane fuel than your average Joe or Joanna on the street. But the message of Live Earth isn’t Madonna’s or whoever’s personal hectoring of everyone else. Their getting up on a stage to support a message that the world needs to stop polluting doesn’t mean they’re pretending they don’t need to do their bit too. Eddie Izzard was one of the presenters, and said exactly that.

I think it’s also worth remembering why popstars jet off all over the earth too – we want them to. It’s not just up to them. Concerts and public appearances in a multiplicity of locations happen because we the public want to see these people. If we want celebrities to stop using so much aviation fuel, instead of grumbling, we could all stop subscribing to celebrity culture. Or we could ask our celebrities to use the train. To pervert an old hippy slogan, suppose they held a world tour and nobody came? (I guess that would be a fauxtation).

Al Gore either has a point or he doesn’t, and as it happens, he does. WE ALL NEED TO USE LESS POWER IN AS MANY WAYS POSSIBLE, DIRECT OR INDIRECT. PERIOD. Moaning about how much people espousing this message consume is nothing less than an excuse to justify doing nothing yourself, and it’s disgusting.


Regeneration and patriarchy: the sequels!

July 7, 2007

I’ve finished reading Pat Barker’s Regeneration, and gone straight out and bought The Eye In The Door and The Ghost Road, which complete the trilogy. I can’t wait to read them. I love it when I get this excited by a book. Naturally it’s all the better when there are subsequent volumes to be read.

It’s often the ideas that the author explores in a book that grab me. Pat Barker has a lot of great ideas about World War I as a pivotal point in how we think about that triangular relationship between men, women, and those who govern us. It was a time when people were eager for change, and this was showing up in all sorts of areas. Barker connects several of these very neatly.

In Regeneration, World War I represents several breaking points. Battle-traumatised officers, in particular war poet Siegfried Sassoon, come to the conclusion that their political masters could no longer demand such systematic sacrifice from the men it governed. Female munitions workers, including suffragettes on temporary political cease-fire, attain new earning power and freedom. Each exemplify a group that reaches towards a new relationship with politics.

This is of course also the time when psychiatry was a new science. It’s brought in alongside the other new technologies of war in the shape of Dr Rivers. His job is to cure the traumatised and get them back to the front. However, Rivers can’t help feeling that the outwardly bizzare behaviours of his patients are in their own way perfectly reasonable reactions to industrialised mass warfare. Preventive medicine is the best cure – peace.

So poet and psychologist are united in their challenge to an archaic, partiarchal political culture. I like that.


Lego digging

July 6, 2007

There’s a sound I’ve been hearing a lot lately, and it’s a very evocative one: the sound of eleven-year-old hands digging around in a large box of Lego pieces in search of exactly the right component for the latest construction project. People often say how smells trigger powerful memories and instantly transport them back to childhood. I don’t really get that with smells – it’s sound that does it for me. And for me, the sound of Lego digging takes me back to when the eleven-year-old hands were my own.

I recall the moments of triumph as I found the essential part – the part I was 98% certain was there, yet whose crucial importance lent a marvellous thrill to my search. After all, it’s in the nature of Lego that it gets lost. There’s natural wastage. The hoover, the sofa, and the bottom of the garden all claim their portion, and you can never be quite sure the piece you require is in the box until it’s in your hand. That’s all part of the fun. It’s what Lego has over Meccano. Somehow, you always keep Meccano sorted into boxes and compartments. You just have to. It doesn’t lend itself to all being slung chaotically into one big box. Meccano is in many ways superior to Lego, but you can’t deny that Lego’s got anarchy.


Faffing hangover

July 5, 2007

I’ve been very grumpy about sharing myself with people lately. It’s the school holidays and Fred’s staying with me, and suddenly it seems like everyone wants a piece of me and I can’t cope. Actually of course it’s me that wants to spend time with them, and the real issue is time management. I faff. I waste time, I hover around trying to figure out what to do next. I read spam emails and do Sudoku. Cut the faffing, and there’d be loads more time for everyone. Not that much of a biggie really.

Last weekend Kat and I had a pretty big evening at our friend Dan’s birthday party, complete with run-in with a weird drunk old man on the way home and dancing to Shakira till 4am. Suffice it to say the next day provided fulsome reminders of the fact that hangovers can include grumpiness.

So I guess you could say I’ve had a faffing hangover. Where drinking too much dehydrates you, overindulgence in faffing robs you of not water but time. Either way, you can end up being like a bear with a sore head. Not much fun to be with.

Ladies and gentlemen, for the sake of those you love, please faff responsibly.


What, no Tycoon?

July 4, 2007

I confess – I’m one of those addicted to programs such as The Apprentice and The Dragons’ Den. It follows inevitably that I avidly lap up Tycoon, a blatant hybrid of the two. This was brought home with a bang this evening when I found it doesn’t seem to be on this week.

There’s quite a few other shows that pick up on the entrepreneur theme in a similar way, and I’m intrigued that we’re so fascinated by this particular sort of reality TV. They say we all have at least one novel inside us – perhaps we’ve all got a business in there too. Maybe that’s where the attraction lies.

After all, in its own way, running your own business is just as much about self-expression as writing a novel.


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.